I tried today's variety with the knowledge that it is a cross between Honeycrisp and Cripps Pink.
![]() |
Update: The patent holder has rebranded this apple as "Wild Twist." It was marketed as "Sweet Cheeks" when I wrote this review, so that is what you will see here.
However, Sweet Cheeks (yes that is a name) did not especially reflect eating qualities from either parent.
Large but not huge, the Cheeks is conical, with slight ribbing. The blush is streaky red over yellow with some areas that are nearly saturated. This blush is decorated with many small tan lenticels ranging from tiny and close together to larger and more widely spaced.
Those lenticels are slightly indented in the peel, an understated echo of Honeycrisp, which is dimpled. The calyx gapes wide, and the peel is glossy. No aroma.
The bite is the big reveal. There's crisp, breaking flesh, medium-coarse and light yellow. The apple is sweet but partially balanced by some tartness.
However, there's very little distinctive flavor—like a Red Delicious in that regard—but Sweet Cheeks has a clean lychee note and, in one sample, some floral accents in towards the core.
Despite a decent crunch (though nothing like that of its famous parent), Sweet Cheeks is a little low in the flavor department.
It strikes me as the sort of apple that, with a some marketing umph, might have been popular 10 or 15 years ago, before the current trend toward flavor.
The name seems to prove Rowan Jacobsen's cynical observation that modern apples are all named for strippers. It is a trademark held by Hess Brothers, a Pennsylvania grower that perhaps originated this variety.
I can't find a plant patent, however, so am at a loss say which of Sweet Cheeks's famous parents provides the pollen and which provides the seed.
Plant patents are all about physical description and lineages, but trademarks don't deal with that—are pretty dull, actually. Behold the papers for the saccharine-cheeked one.
It feels great to read about things that are totally unknown to you. Blogs like this one always add to your knowledge. Will have to eat sweet cheeks someday.
ReplyDeleteI just bought these at our local supermarket and they are the best apple I have eaten, better than honey crisp and ambrosia, my used to be favorites!
ReplyDeleteFound the Hess Brothers employee
DeleteI too found this apple as one of the best I have ever tasted. Discovered it at a local orchard in PA last fall purchased 3 bushels and made apple chips via a mandolin and a food drier . Gave them out as Christmas presents. Came back with rave reviews. Purchased another bushel in January from same place. Tasted even better then. So a good “keeper”, very firm, sweet and juicey. Nothing even close to those bland red delicious, can’t believe that was even mentioned in the review Very thankful to find them at my local grocer several weeks ago.
ReplyDeleteAGjb—I did not intend to make any invidious comparisons.
DeleteI do feel that someone who likes Red Delicious could probably enjoy these as well (and perhaps even come to prefer them).
This apple has tons of flavor. Not sure whats wrong with the author's taste buds
ReplyDeleteWhen you figure it out, let me know!
DeleteIn the meantime, what does Sweet Cheeks taste like to you?
I bought some apples yesterday that I had never heard of before, called Wild Twist. I searched for it on your blog and couldn't find it, Adam. Aha! I thought, an apple Adam hasn't reviewed. But that seemed unlikely. So I found a website that said in 2020 Sweet Cheeks was renamed as Wild Twist. And then I looked up your review of Sweet Cheeks and of course here is your review. I agree with your assessment of the apple. It's got a nice enough crunch but not much flavor. I note that you even said in this Sweet Cheeks review that maybe with better marketing... and here they have renamed it.
ReplyDeleteWell! I've been hearing about Wild Twist, but nothing connection it to Sweet Cheeks. So I appreciate your research!
DeleteWild Twist is a Honeycrisp x Cripps Pink cross (Cripps better known as Pink Lady). That actually sounds pretty promising, though for me it was a promise unmet.
The new name still satisfies Rowan Jacobsen's rule.
What is Rowan Jacobsen's rule? And thanks for your reply. I had wondered if my comment disappeared into the internet ether.
DeleteFrom above:
DeleteThe name seems to prove Rowan Jacobsen's cynical observation that modern apples are all named for strippers.
We tried Sweet Cheeks this year and loved the taste and texture.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely my favorite apple!!